Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Plots
- 100 plots
- Land area
- 25,290 sq m
- Description
- As per Township policy 2024 12.5% of the total saleable area i.e. E64, E65, E66, E67, E 68, E69, E88, E89 & E90 had been mortgaged with Nagar Palika Khajuwala for the Internal Development works related to this project. Open Area Includes Informal Non Salable 641.88 Sq. Meter, Park and Playground 1770.92 Sq. Meter and Road 8235.85 Sq Meter= 10348.65 Sq Meter
Timeline
Find your plot
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each size exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationHARI RAM
The only project Horizon has read from this promoter so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- Murabba No. 62/63, Killa No. 6 (0.2529 Hec.), Killa No. 7 (0.2529 Hec) , Killa No. 8/1 (0.1264 Hec), Killa No. 8/2 (0.1265 Hec), Killa No. 9 (0.2529 Hec), Killa No.10 (0.2529 Hec) Killa No. 11 (0.2529 Hec), Killa No.12 (0.2529 Hec), Killa No. 13 (0.2529 Hec), Killa No. 14 (0.2529 Hec), Killa No. 15 (0.2529 Hec), Total 2.529 sq Mtr, Chak 8KJDA Tehsil - Khajuwala, District – Bikaner -334023 (Raj), CHAK 8 KJDA, KHAJUWALA, Khajuwala, Bikaner, 334023
- Village
- KHAJUWALA
- Taluka
- Khajuwala
- District
- Bikaner
- Pincode
- 334023
₹4.84 Cr declared to build 100 plots. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planA sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Municipal body
A Nagar Nigam / Parishad / Palika that sanctions within its own town limits. It has approved 358 RERA projects across 29 districts — about 1 in 6 in Rajasthan.
Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.