Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Land area
- 17,300 sq m
- Completion deadline extended
- 2 extensions on record — latest to 16 Nov 2021declared reason: other than force majeure
- Description
- As per the U.I.T., Kota layout plan approval letter no. F-7/D.T.P./2018/317 dated 17/05/2018 point no. 10, and remark put on the copy of approved layout plan “For Internal development in the scheme, 12.5 Percent saleable plot numbers 1, 2, 3, 43, 44, 45, 46,84, 85,98 area 12899.78 sq.ft. are mortgage to U.I.T., Kota. These Plots will be demortgaged after the internal development. 90 A order , Approved layout plan and Approval letter are issued to Project Land Khasra No 225,226,641/225 & 227/488. But in footnote of Approved site Layout plan it is being mention that project land khasra no. 225,226,641/225 & 227/488 are demarcated in Project land Khasra No 225, We request and seek RERA Registration of the Same Project for Khasra No 225,226,641/225 & 227/488. We have uploaded approved layout plan for our project on the RERA website, which is the best possible quality of scan of Map we could provide. Also For our proposed project, we have not appointed any Architect.
Timeline
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationAPEXA INVESTMENT
The only project Horizon has read from this promoter so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- 225,226,227/488,641/225, SOGRIYA TO CHANDRESAL, SOGRIYA , Ladpura, Kota, 324002
- Village
- SOGRIYA
- Taluka
- Ladpura
- District
- Kota
- Pincode
- 324002
₹5.74 Cr declared. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (16 Nov 2019) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Urban Improvement Trust
A city-level Urban Improvement Trust — Rajasthan's town-development body in cities without a development authority. It has approved 612 RERA projects across 20 districts — about 1 in 4 in Rajasthan.
Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.