HORIZONMarkets
01

Complete project overview

RERA Karnataka · Registration filing
Status
New Project Launch
Units
333 units
Unit mix
100 × 3 BHK · 98 × 2.5 BHK · 96 × 2 BHK · 32 × 4 BHK · 4 × 6 BHK · 2 × 5 BHK · 1 × 8 BHK
Towers
5
Floors
17
Land area
16,576 sq m
Built-up area
54,817 sq m
FAR sanctioned
2.25
Covered area
3,522 sq m
Open area
13,054 sq m
Land parcels
2 survey nos

Timeline

Project startedJan 2026
RERA registeredMar 2026
Proposed completionMar 2031
TodayJul 2026
Construction progress

0% overall, as filed

Sub-structure0%
Super-structure0%
Finishing0%
Internal infra0%
External infra0%
Amenities0%
Common areas0%
From the promoter's latest quarterly progress report filed with RERA Karnataka — % complete overall and by stage, as of that filing. A dated snapshot, not a live tracker.

Find your flat

Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-flat listing. Look yours up.

333 units across 7 batches
TypeArea sq mCount
3 BHK94100
5 BHK1752
8 BHK2311
6 BHK1594
2.5 BHK8598
4 BHK11432
2 BHK7196

Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).

02

Builder’s track record

RERA Karnataka · Promoter registration

Arvind Smart Homes Private Limited

CompanyPromoter type
Bengaluru UrbanBased in
2Projects
2Cities
2024–presentActive
Timelineevery project, start → promised completion
Builder DNAthe whole portfolio, summed
333 homes · 313 plotson the public record across 2 projects
54,817 sq mbuilt-up filed
16,576 sq mland declared
₹330.47 Crdeclared build cost

Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.

Planning authoritiesthis builder's portfolio, by approving body
BDA - Bangalore Development AuthorityUrban Development Authoritythis project1 of 2 projects
Local Planning AuthorityTown & Country Planning (DTCP)1 of 2 projects

Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.

Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.

03

Location & price analysis

RERA Karnataka · Registration filing
Taluk
Bengaluru South
District
Bengaluru Urban
Pincode
560080
Address
Sy No. 11/3 and 11/7 of Gottigere Village , Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk , Bengaluru South , Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560080
North boundary
Kothanur Village Boundary and Road
East boundary
Land bearing Sy.No. 11/1, 2, 4, 5 and remaining portion of the same Survey number
South boundary
Property bearing Sy.No. 10 & 11/2
West boundary
Kothanuru Village Boundary and Land of Jeevalaya
What’s nearby
Schools2 schools within 500m · 9 educational institutions within 1km · College or university 768m away
HealthcareHospital 757m away · Pharmacy within 1km
LifestyleNo parks within 2km · Gym or sports centre 568m away · 3 restaurants and cafes within 1km
ShoppingSupermarket 969m away · Bank 979m away
Getting around
Expressway 3.7 km · Kanakapura RoadPrimary road 663 m · Bannerghatta RoadMetro station 3.7km away (Konanakunte Cross)4 bus stops within 500m
Water & environment
Water body 147 m · Subrayana Lake
distances only — not a flood assessment
Land, title & encumbrance
LandOwned by the promoter
ConversionConverted to non-agricultural
LitigationDeclared free of litigation
As declared by the promoter at registration — a RERA self-declaration, not an authority's independent finding. A flagged line is worth verifying against the title documents; it is not a verdict.
Price analysisdeclared build cost — not a sale price

₹233.81 Cr declared to build 333 flats. What that works out to:

₹70.21 Lakhdeclared cost per flatall-in — land + construction
₹3,963/sq ftof built-up area₹42,652/sq m
34%of the cost is land₹4,471/sq ft of land

This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.

04

Planning authority

RERA Karnataka · Approved building plan

BDA - Bangalore Development Authority

Urban Development Authority
approved 28 Oct 2025 · 9 mo ago
Building Permit no. BDA/TPM/DLP-27/2835/2025-26Survey no. 11/3
The occupancy certificate — the proof that isn’t here

A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.

Verify it yourself — look up plan BDA/TPM/DLP-27/2835/2025-26 on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the sanction.

The approving body, at scale

BDA

Urban Development Authority · Bangalore Development Authority

Has approved 830 RERA projectsabout 1 in 11 in Karnataka.

an apartments market73% apartments · 27% plotted layouts. Apartments like yours are this body's core business.

Builders
626
On record
82,843 flats · 16,515 plots
Reach
13 taluks
Since
2017

More apartment-heavy than Karnataka overall — 73% apartments here vs 62% statewide.

Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.

Complaints register

None on record with RERA Karnataka against this project.

Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the register — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.

What this record cannot tell you

  • Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
  • Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
  • What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.