Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Land area
- 8,825 sq m
- Description
- 1. Prompters are owner of Khasra No 1289/308 for which Registry enclosed but no path/way was for this khasara number due to it on order of UIT owner of khasara no 1316/1288 and 1289/952 have surrender khasara no 1316/1288 and 1289/952 for path/way. 2. Three Khasara are attached with each other but in the revenue village point of view Khasara no 1289/308 and 1316/1288 are under revenue village Nala Ka Balaji and Khasara No 1289/952 is under revenue Village Ghorana. Khasara No 1289/952 and 1316/1288 is only for Rasta and due to it Actual Location which will be sold after RERA registration is at Nala Ka Balaji, Balaji Nagar Saleable Khasara is 1289/308 which is at Nala Ka Balaji. So Actual Loaction is Nala Ka Balaji . Jamabandi of Khasara no. 1289/952 and 1316/1288 is also uploaded which was surrender for Rasta 3. According to UIT for Internal Development Work 12.5% land are mortgaged under UIT in which Plot No 26,27 and 28 Covers which are also separately mentioned in "Plot Detail" as "Unsanctioned Plots"
Timeline
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationPRAKASHCHAND SAINI
The only project Horizon has read from this promoter so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- 1289/308,1316/1288 and 1289/952, PIPRALI ROAD, NALA KA BALAJI , Sikar, Sikar, 332027
- Village
- NALA KA BALAJI
- Taluka
- Sikar
- District
- Sikar
- Pincode
- 332027
₹85.97 Lakh declared. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (9 Nov 2024) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Urban Improvement Trust
A city-level Urban Improvement Trust — Rajasthan's town-development body in cities without a development authority. It has approved 612 RERA projects across 20 districts — about 1 in 4 in Rajasthan.
Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.