Complete project overview
RERA Madhya Pradesh · Registration filing- Units
- 132 flats
- Unit mix
- 76 × 2BHK · 20 × 3BHK · 18 × 4BHK · 16 × 1BHK · 2 × 5BHK
- Quarterly reports
- 3 on file · latest Oct 2017 - Dec 2017quarterly progress certificates filed with RERA
Timeline
Find your flat
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-flat listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RERA Madhya Pradesh · Promoter registrationLANDMARK DEVELOPERS
Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RERA Madhya Pradesh · Registration filing- District
- Satna
- Tehsil
- Raghurajnagar
- Planning area
- Satna
- Address
- Capetown Heights, Panna Road, Near Sarthak Hospital, NH-75, Satna , M.P. 485001
₹37.73 Cr declared to build 132 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RERA Madhya Pradesh · Approved building planThe promised possession date (30 Mar 2019) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Satna
Town & Country Planning area · Satna districtHas approved 23 RERA projects — 0.4% of Madhya Pradesh.
a mixed market — 57% apartments · 43% plotted layouts.
- Builders
- 16
- On record
- 1,311 flats · 821 plots
- Reach
- 2 tehsils
- Since
- 2017
More apartment-heavy than Madhya Pradesh overall — 57% apartments here vs 28% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Complaints — RERA Madhya Pradesh does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.