Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Units
- 509 units
- Mix
- 270 × 2 BHK LIG · 126 × 1 BHK EWS · 81 × 2BHK LIG · 32 × LIG 2BHK
- Carpet area
- 33–51 sq mper-type range, as filed
- Land area
- 9,802 sq m
- Completion deadline extended
- 2 extensions on record — latest to 9 Jan 2023declared reason: force majeure
- Description
- 1. The phase area for phase was filled as 2951.85 sq. mtr. by mistake, the phase area should be read as total area 9801.51 sq.mtr. and the same has been marked on the drawings uploaded. Remaining amount has deposited in RERA Account by RTGS 2. The previously mentioned account details of the project account were :- Name bank account account holder :- H L GROUP A/C No. :- 50200028908220 IFSC Code :- HDFC0001054 Bank Name :- AXIS BANK Branch :- HDFC BANK LTD TREETH STHAN, HOTEL VINOD STATION ROAD Beawar. 3. Based on the required of the promoters the account details has been changed on 27.09.2018 4. The Bank detail and projects details like that projects name, promoter profile,co promoter detail, Form g, Form B & land documents has been modified on 27/09/2018 based on the application of the promoter.As per remark the correct phase area has been rectified in Land Details of Registering Project.
Timeline
Find your flat
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-flat listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationR-TECH BUILDTECH LLP
The only project Horizon has read from this promoter so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- 1097, VILLAGE FATEHPURIYA-II BEAWAR, Beawar, Ajmer, 305901
- Taluka
- Beawar
- District
- Ajmer
- Pincode
- 305901
₹32.63 Cr declared to build 509 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (9 Jan 2021) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Municipal body
A Nagar Nigam / Parishad / Palika that sanctions within its own town limits. It has approved 358 RERA projects across 29 districts — about 1 in 6 in Rajasthan.
Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.