PadampurPlotted Development
Baam Enclave
SAHIL SIGCHI
Mar 2026registered
Jan 2027target completion
Declared cost₹75.00 LakhScale35 plotsAuthorityRAJ-RERA
GOKULAM PALM SECTOR - 01
01
Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Project name
- GOKULAM PALM SECTOR - 01
- Plots
- 82 plots
- Land area
- 18,094 sq m
- Description
- As per Township policy 2010 12.5% of the total saleable area i.e. Plot No I-10, I-11, I-12, I-22, I-23, J-25, J-26, J-27, J-28, J-29, J-30 and Informal Sector have been mortgaged with Urban Improvement Trust, Sri Ganganagar for the Internal Development works related to this project. Open Area is 5518.43 Sq Mtr (which includes 5518.43 Sq. Mtr. For Road)
Timeline
Construction startMay 2025
RERA registeredJun 2025
Proposed completionNov 2026
TodaySep 2026
Find your plot
Filed by type and size, in the batches the builder registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.
TypeArea sq mCount
Plot1633
Plot1391
Plot1952
Plot1398
Plot843
Plot1951
Plot1782
Plot1392
Plot3681
Plot2375
Plot1398
Plot13912
Plot1675
Plot1166
Plot16711
Plot1815
Plot843
Plot701
Plot1971
Plot701
Plot1511
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each size exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
02
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Builder registrationSUKHJINDER SINGH SANDHU
IndividualPromoter type
Sri Ganganagar, RajasthanBased in
1Projects
1City
2025–presentActive
Timelineevery project, start → promised completion
The only project Horizon has read from this builder so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
03
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- Chak 4 A Chhoti, Tehsil & District Sri Ganganagar PIN 335040 – Muraba No. 20 Kila No. 21 (0.253 hectare), Kila No. 22 (0.253 hectare),Kila No. 23 (0.253 hectare),Kila No. 24 (0.253 hectare),Kila No. 25/1 (0.228 hectare),Kila No. 25/2 (0.0250 hectare), total 1.265 hectare; and Muraba No. 21 Kila No. 23/4 (0.0384 hectare),Kila No. 24 (0.253 hectare), 25 (0.253 hectare), CHAK 4 A CHOTI, Ganganagar, Sri Ganganagar, 335001
- Village
- CHAK 4 A CHOTI
- Taluka
- Ganganagar
- District
- Sri Ganganagar
- Pincode
- 335001
What’s nearby
SchoolsNo schools within 2km
HealthcareNo hospital within 5km
LifestyleNo parks within 2km
ShoppingNo supermarket within 2km
Getting around
No metro or railway within 5kmLimited bus connectivity nearby
Water & environment
Water body 1.4 km
distances only — not a flood assessmentPrice analysisdeclared build cost — not a sale price
₹2.35 Cr declared to build 82 plots. What that works out to:
₹2.86 Lakhdeclared cost per plotall-in — land + construction
₹120/sq ftof plotted area₹1,296/sq m
38%of the cost is land₹46/sq ft of land
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
04
Government Guidance Rate
Rajasthan registration departmentIn Rajasthan it’s called the DLC rate.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Rajasthan's schedule is in Horizon's record, but this project's filed location couldn't be matched to one place with certainty — so no figure is shown rather than a guess.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
05
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planLayout Permitapproved 25 Jun 2025 · 1 yr ago
The occupancy certificate — the proof that isn’t here
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
06
Complaints & litigation
RAJ-RERA · public recordComplaints register
Not published. RAJ-RERA doesn’t publish a complaints register in the record Horizon reads.
So there is nothing to count here — which is not the same as nothing having been filed.
What the builder declared
Declared to RAJ-RERA- Litigation
- None declared in this filing
Only what the builder declared, or what RAJ-RERA records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RAJ-RERA, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
07
Other projects nearby
The register · within 25 km12 plotted projects still under way within 25 km. Step out ring by ring:
1 project within 10 km — showing the nearest 1.
Projects within 25 km, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. This project’s coordinate is approximate, so distances are rough.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.