Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Plots
- 95 plots
- Land area
- 14,007 sq m
- Description
- 1. That there is no plot no.60 and further the part area of plot no. 60 is merge in plot no.59 and part area is surrendered in road. Further we have mentioned the Breakup Total Plot-1 to 59, 61 to 82, IC-1 to IC-13, COMM. 2. We have applied for RERA registration of Project vide application number: RAJ-RERA-APP-P-2024-9834, dated 05-04-2024. That we have taken booking prior to the RERA Registration of Project and the notice bearing no-F-15(293) RAJ /RERA/C/2024/D-12681:1271 u/s-3/59 of RERA Act, 2016 dated 26.02.2024 has been issued to us and Honourable Chairman has imposed a penalty of Rs 1,49,000/- by passing the order on 29.10.2024 bearing no- F-15(293) RAJ-RERA-C-2024. That we have deposited the penalty on 11-11-2024 vide UTR No-BARBW24316185781 in compliance with the order but subsequently our file was rejected by RERA on 03-03-2025. So, we are again applying for RERA Registration of our project and we have already deposited the penalty u/s-3/59 of the RERA Act,2016.
Timeline
Find your plot
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each size exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationGYAN VIHAR COLONY
The only project Horizon has read from this promoter so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- 55,86,87,88,89, KUDAYLA, Ramganj Mandi, Kota, 326519
- Village
- KUDAYLA
- Taluka
- Ramganj Mandi
- District
- Kota
- Pincode
- 326519
₹2.70 Cr declared to build 95 plots. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (28 Feb 2025) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Municipal body
A Nagar Nigam / Parishad / Palika that sanctions within its own town limits. It has approved 358 RERA projects across 29 districts — about 1 in 6 in Rajasthan.
Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.