Complete project overview
RERA Karnataka · Registration filing- Status
- Ongoing
- Units
- 137 units
- Unit mix
- 90 × SHOP · 29 × OTHERS · 18 × COMMERCIAL
- Towers
- 1
- Floors
- 6
- Land area
- 3,439 sq m
- Built-up area
- 15,982 sq m
- FAR sanctioned
- 2.56
- Covered area
- 1,775 sq m
- Open area
- 1,664 sq m
- Land parcels
- 2 survey nos
Timeline
74% overall, as filed
Find your unit
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-unit listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RERA Karnataka · Promoter registrationICARE BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS
Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RERA Karnataka · Registration filing- Taluk
- Moodabidri
- District
- Dakshina Kannada
- Pincode
- 574227
- Address
- PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING IN , S.N 185/4 & 185/5 OF MARPADY VILLAGE MOODABIDRI TALUK, D.K , Moodabidri , Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka - 574227
- North boundary
- 13° 3'43.00"N
- East boundary
- 13° 3'43.88"N
- South boundary
- 74°58'47.42"E
- West boundary
- 74°58'48.63"E
₹44.55 Cr declared to build 137 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RERA Karnataka · Approved building planA sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Verify it yourself — look up plan MDB-LBPAS-10157/20-21/BP on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the sanction.
Local Planning Authority
Town & Country PlanningHas approved 1,518 RERA projects — about 1 in 6 in Karnataka.
a mixed market — 42% apartments · 58% plotted layouts.
- Builders
- 1,212
- On record
- 42,750 flats · 54,584 plots
- Reach
- 128 taluks
- Since
- 2017
More layout-heavy than Karnataka overall — 58% plots here vs 38% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
None on record with RERA Karnataka against this project.
Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the register — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.