Filed by type and size, in the batches the builder registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.
176 of 176 available
TypeArea sq mAvailable
Plot1681 of 1
Plot1844 of 4
Plot20118 of 18
Plot2184 of 4
Plot1761 of 1
Plot1811 of 1
Plot2581 of 1
Plot2131 of 1
Plot3691 of 1
Plot3241 of 1
Plot2971 of 1
Plot1993 of 3
Plot2801 of 1
Plot2401 of 1
Plot2011 of 1
Plot1371 of 1
Plot881 of 1
Plot1621 of 1
Plot1679 of 9
Plot1921 of 1
Plot2101 of 1
Plot13948 of 48
Plot1804 of 4
Plot2031 of 1
Plot2371 of 1
Plot2341 of 1
Plot2391 of 1
Plot2441 of 1
Plot2481 of 1
Plot2321 of 1
Plot2141 of 1
Plot2881 of 1
Plot1681 of 1
Plot1681 of 1
Plot1611 of 1
Plot1836 of 6
Plot2132 of 2
Plot1627 of 7
Plot1721 of 1
Plot1551 of 1
Plot1538 of 8
Plot1291 of 1
Plot1231 of 1
Plot1131 of 1
Plot1071 of 1
Plot1163 of 3
Plot1071 of 1
Plot1451 of 1
Plot1521 of 1
Plot1561 of 1
Plot1611 of 1
Plot1161 of 1
Plot1845 of 5
Plot1691 of 1
Plot2021 of 1
Plot2151 of 1
Plot1781 of 1
Plot1945 of 5
Plot1261 of 1
Plot1641 of 1
Plot2031 of 1
Plot2411 of 1
Plot2541 of 1
Plot2041 of 1
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. As filed at registration, in the batches the builder declared — not a live booking system.
35 homes · 176 plotson the public record across 2 projects
3,021 sq mbuilt-up filed
53,401 sq mplotted area
54,676 sq mland declared
₹12.36 Crdeclared build cost
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Planning authoritiesthis builder's portfolio, by approving body
Ahmedabad Municipal CorporationMunicipal / Corporation1 of 2 projects
Directorate of Town & Country Planning (DTCP)Town & Country Planning (DTCP)this project1 of 2 projects
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Elkathurthy Grampanchayat, Elkathurthi Mandal, Hanamkonda District
Village
Elkathurthi
Mandal
Elkathurthy
District
Warangal Urban
Pincode
505476
North boundary
ROAD
East boundary
AGRICULTURE LAND OF OTHERS
South boundary
AGRICULTURE LAND OF OTHERS
West boundary
AGRICULTURE LAND OF OTHERS
What’s nearby
SchoolsNo schools within 2km
HealthcareNo hospital within 5km · 1 clinic within 1km · Doctor's clinic within 1km
LifestyleNo parks within 2km
ShoppingNo supermarket within 2km
Getting around
Expressway 12 mNo metro or railway within 5kmLimited bus connectivity nearby
Water & environment
Canal 924 mWater body 4.0 km
distances only — not a flood assessment
Declared external development
Roads0%
Water supply0%
Sewerage (Chamber,…0%
Rainwater0%
Green Strip/TOT LO…0%
Street lighting0%
Community Building…0%
Sewage0%
Solid waste0%
Rainwater0%
Renewable energy0%
Fire safety0%
Electricity0%
Aggregate area of …0%
% complete as filed at registration — no progress updates are published, so this is a starting-line snapshot.
Location — done
04
Government Guidance Rate
Telangana Registration & Stamps
In Telangana it’s called the market value — the registration department's figure, not a sale price.
₹3,000per sq yd
₹3,588per sq m
₹1,800per sq ft for a flat · same schedule
Which rate
residential (urban)
Matched to
The rate published for the village of “ELKATHURTHI”.
In force
effective May 2026
Elsewhere in the same village
ELKATHURTHI VILLAGE
₹3,588 / sq m
₹3,000 / sq yd
CHINTHALAPALLY
₹3,588 / sq m
₹3,000 / sq yd
INDIRA NAGAR
₹3,588 / sq m
₹3,000 / sq yd
INTERNAL ROAD TO KUMMARI WADA INTERNAL
₹3,588 / sq m
₹3,000 / sq yd
SIDDIPET INTERNAL ROAD REDDY WADA BANDALU
₹3,588 / sq m
₹3,000 / sq yd
SIDDIPET MAIN ROAD REDDY WADA BANDALU
₹5,741 / sq m
₹4,800 / sq yd
The same schedule, published for the places around this one — so the figure above reads in its neighbourhood, not alone.
What this number is — and isn’t
The minimum value Telangana’s registration department will register a sale at. Stamp duty is usually charged on this or the price in the sale deed, whichever is higher.
Not a market price. Sales normally register above it, and how far above varies by place and by project.
Its fit depends on the grain the state publishes at. This one is matched at the level of village, and says so above. How Horizon decides what to show.
The occupancy certificate — the proof that isn’t here
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Verify it yourself — look up plan 393756/LP/GP/201117/0006/2024 on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the approval.
The approving body, at scale
DTCP
Town & Country Planning · towns & district HQs across Telangana
Has approved 3,737 RERA projects — about 1 in 3 in Telangana, more than any other body in the state.
a plotted-layout market — 32% apartments · 68% plotted layouts. Your plotted layout is this body's core business.
Builders
2,933
On record
41,686 flats · 4,33,404 plots
Reach
287 mandals
Since
2012
More layout-heavy than Telangana overall — 68% plots here vs 34% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.