Is KALPVAN registered under RERA?

Yes. KALPVAN by ORG PROJECTS LLP is on the public record with RAJ-RERA under RERA registration number RAJ/P/2026/5115.

When is KALPVAN due for possession?

The promised completion date on file with RAJ-RERA is April 2030. This is the date the promoter filed, not a prediction of delivery.

Who is the builder of KALPVAN?

KALPVAN is filed by ORG PROJECTS LLP (Organisation), per its RAJ-RERA registration.

Which authority approved KALPVAN?

The layout permit for KALPVAN was approved by Nagar Palika, Nawa. This is the sanction of the plan, not confirmation the project was built to it.

What is the declared cost of KALPVAN?

The declared project cost on record (land plus construction) is ₹64.3 crore. This is the cost the promoter declared to RAJ-RERA, not a sale or per-unit price.

Where is KALPVAN located?

KALPVAN is located in Nawa, Nagaur, Rajasthan, as filed with RAJ-RERA.

KALPVAN RERA, Nagaur, Rajasthan — the public record

Name: KALPVAN — public record
Creator: RAJ-RERA

KALPVAN

RAJ/P/2026/5115 · RAJ-RERA · https://gethorizon.in/projects/kalpvan-nawa-nagaur-kqe1rovy

Complete project overview

RAJ-RERA · Registration filing

Project name: KALPVAN
Plots: 382 plots
Land area: 66,275 sq m
Description: 1. As per Township Policy 2024, 29 Plots (C-06 to 08, P-269 to 281, P-133 to 145) having Total area of 3402.87 sq. mtr. equal to 10% have been kept as mortgage under Nagar Palika, Nawa. These plots would be allotted after the internal development work of project is completed and development charges are deposited with Nagar Palika, Nawa. 2. The total saleable area of 34010.03 sq. mtrs. includes residential plots (28746.34 sq. mtr.), LIG Plots (1731.07 sq. mtr.), EWS Plots (1143.64 sq. mtr.), Commercial Plots (2082.98 sq. mtr.) & Informal Shops (306 sq. mtr.) 3.The Total Open Area 26962.97 Square meters (includes 2651.00 Sq Mtr for Park, 1988.25 sq. mtr. for Playground, 451.63 sq. mtr. for Parking and 21872.09 Sq Mtr For Road).

Timeline

Construction startApr 2026

RERA registeredJun 2026

Proposed completionApr 2030

TodaySep 2026

Find your plot

Filed by type and size, in the batches the builder registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.

382 plots across 63 batches

TypeArea sq mCount

Plot1461

Plot1431

Plot1432

Plot1971

Plot1563

Plot2241

Plot441

Plot451

Plot4125

Plot421

Plot621

Plot551

Plot571

Plot601

Plot631

Plot661

Plot691

Plot721

Plot731

Plot711

Plot691

Plot671

Plot591

Plot561

Plot531

Plot611

Plot581

Plot561

Plot601

Plot671

Plot661

Plot721

Plot621

Plot933

Plot1723

Plot10222

Plot93142

Plot1576

Plot15618

Plot1731

Plot1321

Plot1401

Plot8446

Plot1403

Plot1452

Plot1431

Plot1021

Plot1431

Plot1441

Plot851

Plot1201

Plot801

Plot934

Plot1432

Plot1801

Plot1722

Plot10222

Plot1731

Plot1721

Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each size exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).

Builder’s track record

RAJ-RERA · Builder registration

ORG PROJECTS LLP

OrganisationPromoter type

Nagaur, RajasthanBased in

7Projects

2Cities

2019–presentActive

Timelineevery project, start → promised completion

ORG NAKSHATRAADARSH NAGARMANGAL RESIDENCY VEDANT SANTOSH VATIKATHE SKY BUNGALOWSAdarsh Nagar PrimeAdarsh Nagar OneKALPVAN

KALPVAN

this project

Plotted Development

Apr 2026started

Apr 2030target completion

382 plots66,275 sq m₹64.30 Cr

Builder DNAthe whole portfolio, summed

216 homes · 571 plotson the public record across 7 projects

39,196 sq mbuilt-up filed

99,659 sq mplotted area

1,18,218 sq mland declared

₹232.85 Crdeclared build cost

Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.

Planning authoritiesthis builder's portfolio, by approving body

Jaipur Development AuthorityDevelopment Authority2 of 3 projects

Nagar Palika, NawaMunicipal / Corporationthis project1 of 3 projects

Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.

Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.

Location & price analysis

RAJ-RERA · Registration filing

Address: Khasra No.- 2698/314, 2212/317, 311, 312, 315 & 316 , 316 Village Nawa, Tehsil Nawa, District Didwana , Kuchaman , Nawa, Nagaur, 341509
Village: Kuchaman
Taluka: Nawa
District: Nagaur
Pincode: 341509

What’s nearby

SchoolsNo schools within 2km

HealthcareHospital 194m away

LifestyleNo parks within 2km

ShoppingNo supermarket within 2km

Getting around

Primary road 91 mNo metro or railway within 5kmLimited bus connectivity nearby

Price analysisdeclared build cost — not a sale price

₹64.30 Cr declared to build 382 plots. What that works out to:

₹16.83 Lakhdeclared cost per plotall-in — land + construction

₹901/sq ftof plotted area₹9,702/sq m

39%of the cost is land₹355/sq ft of land

This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.

Government Guidance Rate

Rajasthan registration department

In Rajasthan it’s called the DLC rate.

No government guidance rate is shown for this project.

Rajasthan's schedule is in Horizon's record, but this project's filed location couldn't be matched to one place with certainty — so no figure is shown rather than a guess.

That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.

Planning authority

RAJ-RERA · Approved building plan

Nagar Palika, Nawa

Municipal / Corporation

Layout Permitapproved 21 Apr 2026 · 5 mo ago

The occupancy certificate — the proof that isn’t here

An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.

The approving body, at scale

Municipal body

A Nagar Nigam / Parishad / Palika that approves within its own town limits. It has approved 358 RERA projects across 29 districts — about 1 in 6 in Rajasthan.

Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.

Complaints & litigation

RAJ-RERA · public record

Complaints register

Not published. RAJ-RERA doesn’t publish a complaints register in the record Horizon reads.

So there is nothing to count here — which is not the same as nothing having been filed.

What the builder declared

Declared to RAJ-RERA

Litigation: None declared in this filing

Only what the builder declared, or what RAJ-RERA records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.

BHAGWATI PUNIYA

Mar 2026registered

Dec 2027target completion

Declared cost₹7.40 CrScale96 plotsAuthorityRAJ-RERA

Open the read Compare

Projects within Nagaur, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. This project’s coordinate is approximate, so distances are rough.

What this record cannot tell you

Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.