LAXMI NAGAR
Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Project name
- LAXMI NAGAR
- Plots
- 303 plots
- Land area
- 82,070 sq m
- Description
- 1. That Plot Nos. 79 to 84, 129 to 134, 155 to 170 (Total -28 Plots and area- 4057.56 sq. mtrs.) have been mortgaged with Nagar Parishad Fatehpur 2. That the Open area -39049.24 mtr sq (its includs-Road Area-25398.02 mtr sq , Park Area -4104.53 mtr sq, Facility +SWM Area -8207.57 mtr sq. and Remaining Informal Sector- 1339.12)
Timeline
Find your plot
Filed by type and size, in the batches the builder registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each size exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Builder registrationJAGDISH
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- 3155/267, 3156/267, 3157/267,3158/267,265,266, BALAJI ROAD, FATEHPUR (NATIONAL HIGHWAY-52), Fatehpur, Sikar, 332301
- Village
- FATEHPUR (NATIONAL HIGHWAY-52)
- Taluka
- Fatehpur
- District
- Sikar
- Pincode
- 332301
₹13.76 Cr declared to build 303 plots. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Government Guidance Rate
Rajasthan IGRS — DLC ratesIn Rajasthan it’s called the DLC rate.
- Which rate
- residential, interior plot
- Matched to
- The rate published for the village of “FATEHPUR”.
- Highest rate
- ₹6,622 per sq yd — the top road-facing rate among the 68 residential rates published for this village
By the road it faces
| interior plot | ₹3,600 / sq m | ₹3,010 / sq yd |
|---|---|---|
| road-facing | ₹4,600 / sq m | ₹3,846 / sq yd |
| 41–60 ft road | ₹5,060 / sq m | ₹4,231 / sq yd |
| 61–99 ft road | ₹5,290 / sq m | ₹4,423 / sq yd |
| 100 ft+ road | ₹5,520 / sq m | ₹4,615 / sq yd |
The same land, priced by the width of the road it faces — each band the middle of the residential rates published for this village.
This filing declares ₹1,677 per sq m of plotted area — 0.47× the government figure. Declared cost is land and construction; the government guidance rate is what the state will not register a sale below. Neither is a sale price.
What this number is — and isn’t
- The minimum value Rajasthan’s registration department will register a sale at. Stamp duty is usually charged on this or the price in the sale deed, whichever is higher.
- Not a market price. Sales normally register above it, and how far above varies by place and by project.
- Its fit depends on the grain the state publishes at. This one is matched at the level of village, and says so above. How Horizon decides what to show.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planAn approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Municipal body
A Nagar Nigam / Parishad / Palika that approves within its own town limits. It has approved 358 RERA projects across 29 districts — about 1 in 6 in Rajasthan.
Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
Complaints & litigation
RAJ-RERA · public recordNot published. RAJ-RERA doesn’t publish a complaints register in the record Horizon reads.
So there is nothing to count here — which is not the same as nothing having been filed.
What the builder declared
Declared to RAJ-RERA- Litigation
- None declared in this filing
Only what the builder declared, or what RAJ-RERA records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RAJ-RERA, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.