Complete project overview
RERA Karnataka · Registration filing- Status
- New Project Launch
- Units
- 898 units
- Unit mix
- 310 × D2 - 3Bed · 298 × E4 - 3Bed · 280 × F2 - 3Bed · 10 × F2a - 2Bed
- Towers
- 5
- Floors
- 30
- Land area
- 22,455 sq m
- Built-up area
- 1,68,266 sq m
- FAR sanctioned
- 2.749
- Covered area
- 4,576 sq m
- Open area
- 17,879 sq m
- Land parcels
- 17 survey nos
Timeline
90% overall, as filed
Find your unit
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-unit listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RERA Karnataka · Promoter registrationPRESTIGE PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RERA Karnataka · Registration filing- Taluk
- Anekal
- District
- Bengaluru Urban
- Pincode
- 562125
- Address
- Sy.Nos. 19/2, 19/3, 19/4, 20/1,20/2, 21, (New No.21/1, 21/2,21/4), 21/5, 22/1, 22/2A (new No.22/5), , 22/2B, 22/3, 23/2, (new No.23/3,23/4 & 23/5) , 24/1, 24/2 and Sy.No.25 of Valagere Kallahalli Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal taluk, Bangalore Sarjapura, Next to Yamare Panch , Anekal , , Anekal , Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 562125
- North boundary
- Private Properties in Sy.No.18, 19 and remaining portion of Sy.No.26.
- East boundary
- Nala and Ittangur Village boundary
- South boundary
- Internal spine road, Open Spaces and remaining portion of land in Sy.No.24/1 of V.K.Halli Village
- West boundary
- Land in Sy.No.30, 31 of V.K.Halli Village i.e. Eden Park @ The Prestige City
₹633.88 Cr declared to build 898 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RERA Karnataka · Approved building planThe promised possession date (28 Feb 2026) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Verify it yourself — look up plan APA/LAO/44/2018-19 on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the sanction.
BMRDA
Urban Development Authority · Bangalore Metropolitan Region Development AuthorityHas approved 550 RERA projects — about 1 in 16 in Karnataka.
a mixed market — 46% apartments · 54% plotted layouts.
- Builders
- 441
- On record
- 16,246 flats · 16,792 plots
- Reach
- 14 taluks
- Since
- 2017
More layout-heavy than Karnataka overall — 54% plots here vs 38% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
None on record with RERA Karnataka against this project.
Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the register — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.