Complete project overview
RERA Madhya Pradesh · Registration filing- Units
- 72 flats
- Unit mix
- 36 × Residential Type (4.573*11.58) · 1 × Residential Type (Onlong Shape) · 1 × Residentialtype (7.91+8.40/2*3.65) · 1 × Residential Type (8.40+8.90/2*3.65) · 1 × Residential Type (8.90+9.21/2*3.65) · 1 × Residential Type (9.21+9.52/2*3.65)
- Revised completion
- 30 Dec 2020extended after an approved RERA extension
- Extensions
- 2 approved · Covid19completion-date extension(s) granted by RERA
- Quarterly reports
- 8 on file · latest Jan 2019 - Mar 2019quarterly progress certificates filed with RERA
Timeline
Find your flat
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-flat listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RERA Madhya Pradesh · Promoter registrationADINATH ASSOCIATE
The only project Horizon has read from this promoter so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RERA Madhya Pradesh · Registration filing- District
- Ratlam
- Tehsil
- Ratlam
- Planning area
- Ratlam
- Address
- Land Situated at Survey no. 490/10/5 Ward no.25, Near Shubh Vihar, Ratlam(M.P.)
₹1.46 Cr declared to build 72 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RERA Madhya Pradesh · Approved building planThe promised possession date (31 Mar 2020) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Ratlam
Town & Country Planning area · Ratlam districtHas approved 110 RERA projects — 2.1% of Madhya Pradesh.
a plotted-layout market — 15% apartments · 85% plotted layouts. Apartments like yours are the smaller share here — this body mostly approves plotted layouts.
- Builders
- 73
- On record
- 1,601 flats · 10,533 plots
- Reach
- 4 tehsils
- Since
- 2017
More layout-heavy than Madhya Pradesh overall — 85% plots here vs 72% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Complaints — RERA Madhya Pradesh does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.