Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Land area
- 19,862 sq m
- Description
- *(1)Initially we have mentioned the phase area 19854 sq meter ,However now the corrected phase area is 19862.09 for the said project and additional fees will be paid accordingly.Here due technical error while changing the phase area it automatically comes as 0. (2)As per the sanctioned layout nomenclature for plot begining B16 & C07,D08 H01 .(3)No seperate sanction approval letter is issued by UIT sriganganagar,the approval letter dated 10/11/17 is the only letter issued by UIT for the said project for consideration of 90A and approval layout.(4) jamabandhi 1 page is clear but 2 and 3 page is not clear because file size is bigger than 20mb ,so have to compless thats why its not clear,but will provide you physical copy in clear and authenticated manner in physical manner.As per remark the correct phase area has been rectified in Land Details of Registering Project.
Timeline
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationRAGHAV MALPANI
The only project Horizon has read from this promoter so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- CHHOTI MURBA NO-23,KILLA NO:1,2,3,4(PART),10,11,20,21(PART), CHHOTI MURBA NO-23,KILLA NO:1,2,3,4(PART),10,11,20,21(PART), CHAK 5 E, Ganganagar, Sri Ganganagar, 335001
- Village
- CHAK 5 E
- Taluka
- Ganganagar
- District
- Sri Ganganagar
- Pincode
- 335001
₹2.58 Cr declared. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (31 Mar 2022) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Urban Improvement Trust
A city-level Urban Improvement Trust — Rajasthan's town-development body in cities without a development authority. It has approved 612 RERA projects across 20 districts — about 1 in 4 in Rajasthan.
Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.