VEDA
Complete project overview
UP-RERA · Registration filing- Project name
- VEDA
- Units
- 153 units
- Unit mix
- 150 × STUDIO · 3 × SHOP
- Carpet area
- 25–656 sq mper unit, as filed
- Floors
- 12
- Land area
- 3,182 sq m
Timeline
Find your flat
Filed by floor and type and size, in the batches the builder registered — not a per-flat listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
UP-RERA · Builder registrationAURIKA DEVELOPERS LLP; ADVIKA BUILDTECH LLP
The only project Horizon has read from this builder so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
UP-RERA · Registration filing- District
- Ayodhya
- Tehsil
- Sadar(Faizabad)
₹105.73 Cr declared to build 153 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Government Guidance Rate
Uttar Pradesh registration departmentIn Uttar Pradesh it’s called the circle rate.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Uttar Pradesh's government guidance rates aren't in Horizon's record yet.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
Planning authority
UP-RERA · Approved building planAn approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Verify it yourself — look up plan HOTEL/03971/AFDA/BP/24-25/0436/30122024 on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the approval.
Complaints & litigation
UP-RERA · public recordNone on record with UP-RERA against this project.
Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the record — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.
What the builder declared
Declared to UP-RERA- Litigation
- None declared in this filing
Only what the builder declared, or what UP-RERA records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with UP-RERA, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
Other projects nearby
The register · within 25 kmNo other commercial projects still under way are on the record within 25 km.
Of the 6 projects the radar draws within 6 km — every kind, every stage — none is a commercial project still under way. This list keeps only those, and looks further out.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — UP-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.