Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Units
- 92 units
- Mix
- 3 × G-15, G-16, G-17 · 2 × S-09 FIRST FLOOR, S-09 SECOND FLOOR · 2 × S-07 FIRST FLOOR, S-07 SECOND FLOOR · 2 × S-18 FIRST FLOOR, S-18 SECOND FLOOR · 2 × S-03 FIRST FLOOR, S-03 SECOND FLOOR · 2 × S-15 FIRST FLOOR, S-15 SECOND FLOOR
- Carpet area
- 7–673 sq mper-type range, as filed
- Land area
- 1,046 sq m
- Description
- 1. We have taken 10% as visitor Parking out of total parking as per approved maps 2. Land Area is 1045.53 sq meters as per the lease deed however in the site plan due to a typographical error land area is printed as 1045.15 sq meters. Kindly ignore the error at UIT Sikar Part and considered the same
Timeline
Find your unit
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-unit listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationSUNIL KUMAR BIDAWATKA
The only project Horizon has read from this promoter so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- Ward No. 34, Silver Jubli Road, SIKAR, Sikar, Sikar, 332001
- Village
- SIKAR
- Taluka
- Sikar
- District
- Sikar
- Pincode
- 332001
₹13.29 Cr declared to build 92 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (20 Feb 2026) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.