IMAGE ICON [ A & B - BLOCK]
IMAGE ADDRESS · Udupi
CRYSTAL RESIDENCY
Timeline
Every flat the builder registered. Look yours up and check it is on the record.
Areas are not shown for this project. The sizes filed against these flats are not credible — units recorded as 2 and 3 BHK are filed at sizes no flat is, which usually means square feet were entered in a column the register labels square metres. Publishing those as the registered carpet area would be worse than publishing nothing. The flat numbers and types above are the register’s.
The only project Horizon has read from this builder so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
₹8.00 Cr declared. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
In Karnataka it’s called the guidance value.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Karnataka's guidance-value gazettes are in Horizon's record, but this project's address doesn't name a place any of its sub-registrar's tables print.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
The promised possession date (30 Mar 2019) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Has approved 134 RERA projects — 1.5% of Karnataka.
an apartments market — 87% apartments · 13% plotted layouts. Apartments like yours are this body's core business.
More apartment-heavy than Karnataka overall — 87% apartments here vs 62% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
None on record with RERA Karnataka against this project.
Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the record — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.
Only what the builder declared, or what RERA Karnataka records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RERA Karnataka, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
77 residential projects still under way within Udupi. Step out ring by ring:
Of the 1 projects the radar draws within 6 km — every kind, every stage — none is a residential project still under way. This list keeps only those, and looks further out.
64 projects between 25 and 50 km — showing the nearest 6.
IMAGE ADDRESS · Udupi
LAKSHMI DEVELOPERS · Udupi
SHETTY BARUA ENTERPRISES LLP · Udupi
PRAVEEN BUILDERS · Kapu
VENUS DEVELOPERS · Udupi
M S NAYAK CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPERS · Udupi
Projects within Udupi, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. Distances from the filed coordinates.
What this record cannot tell you