JBBR KANVAS PHASE 1
Timeline
Filed by type and size, in the batches the builder registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each size exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
₹11.14 Cr declared to build 77 plots. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
In Uttar Pradesh it’s called the circle rate.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Uttar Pradesh's government guidance rates aren't in Horizon's record yet.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Verify it yourself — look up plan 1477/1039/UPSIDA/PAR0KA0/2025-2026 on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the approval.
None on record with UP-RERA against this project.
Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the record — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.
Only what the builder declared, or what UP-RERA records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with UP-RERA, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
41 plotted projects still under way within 25 km. Step out ring by ring:
Of the 1 projects the radar draws within 6 km — every kind, every stage — none is a plotted project still under way. This list keeps only those, and looks further out.
4 projects within 10 km — showing the nearest 4.
MS DHANUSHKOTI BUILDER AND DEVELOPERS; BHARAT BHUSHAN SINGH; RITA SINGH · Sarojini Nagar · Lucknow
AKASA EARTH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED; AKHILESH PANDEY; ANIL PANDEY; AP DEVELOPERS; MS INDUSTRIES · Sarojini Nagar · Lucknow
TRUSCAPE REALTY; ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI; JAVENDRA KUMAR TIWARI; RAGHVENDRA SINGH; UMESH SINGH · Sarojini Nagar · Lucknow
ELDECO HOUSING AND INDUSTRIES LTD.; SHOBHIT KUMAR; SWARG CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED · Sarojini Nagar · Lucknow
Projects within 25 km, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. Distances from the filed coordinates.
What this record cannot tell you