HORIZONMarkets
01

Complete project overview

MahaRERA · Registration filing
Floors
1
Buildings
2
Parking
2 spaces
Land area
460 sq m
Sanctioned built-up
106 sq m
Recreational open space
2,540 sq m

Timeline

RERA registeredJul 2024
Proposed completionNov 2026
TodayJul 2026
Construction progress
Basement (if any)0%
Podiums0%
Stilt floor0%
Flat fit-out0%
Stairs & lifts0%
OC-readiness0%
Sewerage (Chamber,…0%
Storm Water Drains0%
Landscaping & Tree…0%
Street Lighting0%
Electrical meter r…0%
Aggregate area of …0%
Open Parking0%
Internal Roads & F…50%
Internal finishes80%
External finishes80%
Excavation100%
Plinth100%
Superstructure100%
Water Supply100%
Water conservation…100%
Per-activity completion % as filed with MahaRERA, shown for in-progress projects — a snapshot, not a live tracker.
02

Builder’s track record

MahaRERA · Promoter registration

Samir Shrinivas Kale

IndividualPromoter type
Thane, MAHARASHTRABased in
38Projects
2Cities
2017–presentActive
Timelineevery project, start → promised completion
Builder DNAthe whole portfolio, summed
80 homes · 30 plotson the public record across 38 projects
13,666 sq mbuilt-up filed
12,297 sq mplotted area
56,079 sq mland declared

These are sums of what the promoter has put on the public record across their projects — a sense of how big a builder this is, not build quality and not whether they finish on time.

Planning authoritiesthis builder's portfolio, by approving body
Guhagar Nagarpanchayat5 of 9 projects
Sdo Chiplunthis project2 of 9 projects
Sdo Chiplun Sub Division, District: Ratnagiri1 of 9 projects
Thane Municipal CorporationMunicipal Corporation1 of 9 projects

Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.

Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.

03

Location

MahaRERA · Registration filing
Village
Kondwadi Tarfe Patpanhale
Taluka
Guhagar
District
Ratnagiri
Pincode
415703
Survey no.
Survey No 53/5
North boundary
Survey No 53 4
East boundary
Survey 53 3
South boundary
Modkagar Dam
West boundary
Modkagar Dam
What’s nearby
SchoolsNo schools within 2km
HealthcareNearest hospital 2.6km away
LifestyleNo parks within 2km
ShoppingNo supermarket within 2km
Getting around
Expressway 890 m · Chiplun Guhagar RoadPrimary road 811 m · Chiplun Guhagar RoadNo metro or railway within 5kmLimited bus connectivity nearby
Water & environment
Water body 924 mRiver 2.3 km
distances only — not a flood assessment
04

Planning authority

MahaRERA · Approved building plan

Sdo Chiplun

Building Permit
Survey no. Survey No 53/5
The occupancy certificate — the proof that isn’t here

A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.

The approving body, at scale

The planning authority

The body that sanctioned this project. It has approved 4,607 RERA projects across 33 districts about 1 in 4 in Maharashtra.

Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.

Legal & regulatory record
LitigationNone declared to MahaRERA
From MahaRERA's record — the litigation flag is the promoter's declaration; complaints, appeals and non-compliance notices are the authority's own filings. A flagged line is worth checking with the authority; none of it is a verdict on the project.
Complaints register

None on record with MahaRERA against this project.

Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the register — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.

What this record cannot tell you

  • Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
  • Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
  • What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.