Residential Scheme for Group Housing & Flat
Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Land area
- 80,969 sq m
- Description
- 1.Since Our Project is Plotted Development Therefore no Professional details are mentioned. 2.There is no Separate copy of Layout Approval letter or Minutes of Meeting and all the condition has been mentioned in Key Layout Plan and such will be treated as Approval Letter. 3.Since it is Plotted Development therefore no parking details are required. 4.Land Cost is taken as DLC Rate.
Timeline
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Builder registrationURBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,KOTA
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
More from URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,KOTA— the full portfolio →
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- 2(Part),2/1(Part),3,4,5,6,12,13,14,15,16,23,23/1,24, village -Hanuwath Khera,88/296,90,91(Part),91/1(Part) village -Naya Nohara, Hanuwath Khera and Naya Nohara, Ladpura, Kota, 324001
- Taluka
- Ladpura
- District
- Kota
- Pincode
- 324001
₹34.38 Cr declared. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Government Guidance Rate
Rajasthan registration departmentIn Rajasthan it’s called the DLC rate.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Rajasthan's schedule is in Horizon's record, but this project's filed location couldn't be matched to one place with certainty — so no figure is shown rather than a guess.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (26 Jun 2022) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Complaints & litigation
RAJ-RERA · public recordNot published. RAJ-RERA doesn’t publish a complaints register in the record Horizon reads.
So there is nothing to count here — which is not the same as nothing having been filed.
Court cases, as declared
Declared by the builder1 case · 0 disposed · 1 open
| Number | Forum | Date | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 274 | Revenue Mandal, Ajmer | 2012 | Stay on Khasara No.-3,4,5,6open |
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RAJ-RERA, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.