Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Land area
- 14,461 sq m
- Description
- 1. The Land cost has been wrongly mentioned as Rs. 57845360 , but the actual land cost is equivalent to zero. 2. There is no seperate approval letter given by UIT, Kota and such has been depicted in approved building plan. 3. There is no other professional details 4.Initally we have mentioned the phase as 14461.34 Sq m. however due to technical error it is showing as 0 therefore it should be read as 14461.34 Sq.mAs per remark the correct phase area has been rectified in Land Details of Registering Project.
Timeline
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationURBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,KOTA
Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- 169,170,171 & 188 , Raipura, Kota, Ladpura, Kota, 324009
- Village
- Kota
- Taluka
- Ladpura
- District
- Kota
- Pincode
- 324009
₹28.33 Cr declared. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (31 Dec 2021) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Kota Development Authority
Development authorityHas approved 21 RERA projects — 1% of Rajasthan.
a plotted-layout market — 19% apartments · 81% plotted layouts. Apartments like yours are the smaller share here — this body mostly approves plotted layouts.
- Builders
- 21
- On record
- 0 flats · 1,011 plots
- Reach
- 3 districts
- Since
- 2017
More layout-heavy than Rajasthan overall — 81% plots here vs 66% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.