KRISHNA BUNGALOWS
HARSHAD GOVINDBHAI HIRPARA AND OTHERS
Shiv Residency
Timeline
0% overall, as filed
Overall % complete as filed with GujRERA, taken as the slowest of the project's blocks — a snapshot, not a live tracker. Where a BU permission is on record (section 04), that is the firmer completion signal.Filed by type and size, in the batches the builder registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each size exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
₹1.17 Cr declared to build 116 plots. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
In Gujarat it’s called the jantri rate — the 2011 book, which is the one in Horizon's record.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Gujarat's jantri is in Horizon's record, but this filing names no place the book prints — or names two — and a survey number repeats in every village of a district, so nothing can be tied to this project without guessing.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
The promised possession date (31 Mar 2020) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
All 3 blocks carry a Building-Use (BU) permission (latest 23 Dec 2019)— Gujarat’s legal-to-occupy sign-off, and the completion proof most RERA records simply don’t carry. Still confirm the BU covers your specific unit before you rely on it.
Has approved 895 RERA projects — about 1 in 19 in Gujarat.
a mixed market — 65% apartments · 35% plotted layouts.
More layout-heavy than Gujarat overall — 35% plots here vs 6% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
4 complaints
GujRERA's list gives each complaint's number and date, not its status or outcome — and only disputes escalated to GujRERA appear here at all.
| Number | What | Date |
|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/NCAR/Surat/200227/0223 | Non-compliance · annual report | 27 Feb 2020 |
| CMP/Surat/200130/000037 | Complaint | 30 Jan 2020 |
| GJ/CMP/NCAR/Surat/190823/0042 | Non-compliance · annual report | 23 Aug 2019 |
| NCQR-34/2018 | Non-compliance · quarterly report | 12 Nov 2018 |
Only what the builder declared, or what GujRERA records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with GujRERA, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
404 plotted projects still under way within 25 km. Step out ring by ring:
8 projects between 3 and 6 km — showing the nearest 6.
HARSHAD GOVINDBHAI HIRPARA AND OTHERS
Rameshbhai Ravjibhai Dobariya
KETAN RATILAL PATEL
GHANASHYAMBHOLABHAIPETHANI AND OTHERS
THAKAR PRATIKBHAI NATAVARLAL AND OTHERS
PAVAN DEVELOPERS
Projects within 25 km, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. This project’s coordinate is approximate, so distances are rough.
What this record cannot tell you