Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Land area
- 17,300 sq m
- Description
- Form G+affidavit Attached on 28-8-17,FOLLOWING DATA WAS INCORRECTLY FILLED EARLIER:- 1. PHASE AREA - PREVIOUSLY FILLED AREA WAS 10192.01 SQ. MTR.(PLOTTED AREA ONLY) 2. FEE PAID PREVIOUSLY: RS. 50960/- (ON 10192.01 SQ. MTR. @ RS. 5 PER SQ. MTR.) THROUGH ONLINE PAYMENT ID 80706840 TRANSACTION NO RERA-TRANS-1447 DATED 31-07-2017. FOLLOWING DETAILS NOW HAS BEEN CORRECTED:- 1. PHASE AREA: CORRECT AREA IS 17300 SQ. MTR. 2. TOTAL FEE IS RS. 86500/- (17300 SQ. MTR. @ RS. 5 PER SQ. MTR.) RS. 50960/- DEPOSITED ON 31-07-2017 THROUGH ONLINE PAYMENT ID 80706840 TRANSACTION NO RERA-TRANS-1447. THE BALANCE FEE OF RS. 35540/- HAS BEEN DEPOSITED THROUGH IMPS-BR-727617919598 AND IMPS-BR-727617919710 DATED 03-10-2017 DRAWN ON BANK OF INDIA. TOTAL FEE DEPOSITED RS. 86500/- (RS. 50960 + RS. 35540). THIS SCHEME CONSIST OF 98 RESIDENTIAL PLOTS AND 10 INFORMAL COMMERCIAL PLOTS. As per remark the correct phase area has been rectified in Land Details of Registering Project.
Timeline
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationMAHAVEER PRASAD NAYAK
Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- KHASRA NO-31&43, SWARAJ ENCLAVE BLOCK-B,NEAR SAMRIDHI NAGAR VISTAR,BARAN ROAD,MAANPURA, KOTA, Ladpura, Kota, 324002
- Village
- KOTA
- Taluka
- Ladpura
- District
- Kota
- Pincode
- 324002
₹4.59 Cr declared. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (2 Jan 2019) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Urban Improvement Trust
A city-level Urban Improvement Trust — Rajasthan's town-development body in cities without a development authority. It has approved 612 RERA projects across 20 districts — about 1 in 4 in Rajasthan.
Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.