1 × Villa No. 24 (Plot No. C-163) · 1 × Villa No. 27 (Plot No. C-164) · 1 × Villa No. 34 (Plot No. C-168 A) · 1 × Villa No. 35 (Plot No. C-168) · 1 × Villa No. 36 (Plot No. C-169) · 1 × Villa No. 40 (Plot No. C-171)
Carpet area
181–267 sq mper-type range, as filed
Land area
1,379 sq m
Description
The promoter is developing villas on individual plots therefore the same was not required to get it approved from the concerned authority i.e. JDA, as the area of all individual plots are less then 250 sq. mtr. and the same has been uploaded under signed and sealed with COA registered architect Mr. Peeyush Jain (CA/98/22471). Further since we are developing individual plots in the scheme, so there is no open/common area in the project.
Timeline
Construction startAug 2014
RERA registeredDec 2020
Proposed completionDec 2027
TodaySep 2026
Find your plot
Filed by type and size, in the batches the builder registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.
10 plots across 10 batches
BuildingTypeArea sq mCount
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 24 (Plot No. C-163)2211
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 27 (Plot No. C-164)2291
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 34 (Plot No. C-168 A)2291
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 35 (Plot No. C-168)2291
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 36 (Plot No. C-169)2291
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 40 (Plot No. C-171)2661
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 44 (Plot No. C-173)2671
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 45 (Plot No. C-173 A)2661
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 47 (Plot No. C-174)2661
UDB Villa Grande Phase-1Villa No. 51 (Plot No. C-176)1811
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each size exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
143 homes · 24 plotson the public record across 5 projects
36,757 sq mbuilt-up filed
5,187 sq mplotted area
18,461 sq mland declared
₹80.08 Crdeclared build cost
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
SchoolsNearest school 1.8km away · College or university 1.9km away · Library 1.7km away
HealthcareHospital 967m away · 4 clinics within 1km
LifestyleNo parks within 2km · Gym or sports centre 1.7km away · Swimming pool within 2km
ShoppingSupermarket 1.7km away
Getting around
Expressway 557 mPrimary road 1.3 km · B2 BypassRailway line 1.0 kmRailway station 1.5km awayLimited bus connectivity nearby
Water & environment
Water body 1.6 km · Dravyavati River
distances only — not a flood assessment
Price analysisdeclared build cost — not a sale price
₹9.05 Cr declared to build 10 flats. What that works out to:
₹90.50 Lakhdeclared cost per flatall-in — land + construction
₹2,773/sq ftof built-up area₹29,843/sq m
50%of the cost is land₹3,032/sq ft of land
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Location & price analysis — done
04
Government Guidance Rate
Rajasthan registration department
In Rajasthan it’s called the DLC rate.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Rajasthan's schedule is in Horizon's record, but this project's filed location couldn't be matched to one place with certainty — so no figure is shown rather than a guess.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
Government Guidance Rate — done
05
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building plan
Building Permitapproved 23 Dec 2020 · 5 yrs ago
The occupancy certificate — the proof that isn’t here
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Planning authority — done
06
Complaints & litigation
RAJ-RERA · public record
Complaints register
Not published. RAJ-RERA doesn’t publish a complaints register in the record Horizon reads.
So there is nothing to count here — which is not the same as nothing having been filed.
What the builder declared
Declared to RAJ-RERA
Litigation
None declared in this filing
Only what the builder declared, or what RAJ-RERA records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RAJ-RERA, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
Complaints & litigation — done
07
Other projects nearby
The register · within 25 km
420 residential projects still under way within 25 km. Step out ring by ring: