HORIZONMarkets
01

Complete project overview

RERA Karnataka · Registration filing
Status
New Project Launch
Units
437 units
Unit mix
292 × 3 Bed · 96 × 2 Bed · 49 × 1 Bed
Towers
2
Floors
26
Land area
23,738 sq m
Built-up area
82,086 sq m
FAR sanctioned
2.49
Covered area
9,237 sq m
Open area
14,501 sq m
Land parcels
4 survey nos

Timeline

RERA registeredFeb 2025
Project startedApr 2025
Proposed completionSep 2028
TodayJul 2026
Construction progress

25% overall, as filed

Finishing0%
Internal infra0%
External infra0%
Amenities0%
Common areas0%
Super-structure1%
Sub-structure68%
From the promoter's latest quarterly progress report filed with RERA Karnataka — % complete overall and by stage, as of that filing. A dated snapshot, not a live tracker.

Find your unit

Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-unit listing. Look yours up.

437 units across 3 batches
TypeArea sq mCount
1 Bed4049
2 Bed6696
3 Bed92292

Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).

02

Builder’s track record

RERA Karnataka · Promoter registration

PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LTD

CompanyPromoter type
Bengaluru UrbanBased in
21Projects
5Cities
2017–presentActive
Timelineevery project, start → promised completion
Builder DNAthe whole portfolio, summed
6,097 homes · 1,315 plotson the public record across 21 projects
15,96,321 sq mbuilt-up filed
6,09,557 sq mland declared
₹11256.81 Crdeclared build cost

Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.

Planning authoritiesthis builder's portfolio, by approving body
BBMP - Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara PalikeMunicipal / Corporation10 of 21 projects
BDA - Bangalore Development AuthorityUrban Development Authoritythis project3 of 21 projects
BIAPPA - Bangalore Airport Area Planning AuthorityUrban Development Authority3 of 21 projects
CMDA (Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority)CMDA (Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority)3 of 21 projects
Nelamangala Planning AuthorityTown & Country Planning (DTCP)1 of 21 projects
Satellite Town Ring Road Planning AuthorityTown & Country Planning (DTCP)1 of 21 projects

Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.

Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.

03

Location & price analysis

RERA Karnataka · Registration filing
Taluk
Anekal
District
Bengaluru Urban
Pincode
560099
Address
Proposed development at Sy. No. 30/24B,30/24C, 30/25A1( PART ) & 30/25B, TIRUPALYA VILLAGE , JIGANI HOBLI,ANEKAL TALUK,BANGALORE URBAN , Anekal , Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560099
North boundary
9m wide existing roads and Private Property
East boundary
Private Property
South boundary
18.10m Existing Road
West boundary
Private Property
What’s nearby
SchoolsNo schools within 2km
HealthcareHospital 1.9km away · 1 clinic within 1km
LifestylePark 829m away
ShoppingSupermarket 507m away
Getting around
Expressway 2.3 km · Hosur RoadPrimary road 4.4 km · Bannerghatta Main RoadMetro station 2.3km away (Biocon Hebbagodi)Bus stop within 500m
Water & environment
Water body 317 m
distances only — not a flood assessment
Land, title & encumbrance
LandJoint development (JDA) — built on the owner’s land by agreement
ConversionConverted to non-agricultural
LitigationDeclared free of litigation
As declared by the promoter at registration — a RERA self-declaration, not an authority's independent finding. A flagged line is worth verifying against the title documents; it is not a verdict.
Price analysisdeclared build cost — not a sale price

₹558.57 Cr declared to build 437 flats. What that works out to:

₹1.28 Crdeclared cost per flatall-in — land + construction
₹6,322/sq ftof built-up area₹68,047/sq m
39%of the cost is land₹8,535/sq ft of land

This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.

04

Planning authority

RERA Karnataka · Approved building plan

BDA - Bangalore Development Authority

Urban Development Authority
approved 15 Jan 2025 · 1 yr ago
Building Permit no. BDA/No./AS/AA-3/TS-2/D/18/2024-25Survey no. 30/24b
The occupancy certificate — the proof that isn’t here

A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.

Verify it yourself — look up plan BDA/No./AS/AA-3/TS-2/D/18/2024-25 on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the sanction.

The approving body, at scale

BDA

Urban Development Authority · Bangalore Development Authority

Has approved 830 RERA projectsabout 1 in 11 in Karnataka.

an apartments market73% apartments · 27% plotted layouts. Apartments like yours are this body's core business.

Builders
626
On record
82,843 flats · 16,515 plots
Reach
13 taluks
Since
2017

More apartment-heavy than Karnataka overall — 73% apartments here vs 62% statewide.

Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.

Complaints register

None on record with RERA Karnataka against this project.

Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the register — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.

What this record cannot tell you

  • Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
  • Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
  • What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.