HORIZONMarkets
01

Complete project overview

MahaRERA · Registration filing
Units
32 units
Mix
24 × 3 BHK · 8 × 2 BHK
Carpet area
57–109 sq mper-unit range, as filed
Floors
6
Buildings
2
Parking
32 spaces
Land area
3,072 sq m
Sanctioned built-up
2,970 sq m
Recreational open space
528 sq m

Timeline

RERA registeredAug 2017
Proposed completionMar 2018
TodayJul 2026

Find your flat

Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-flat listing. Look yours up.

32 units across 6 batches
TypeArea sq mCount
3 BHK1098
3 BHK998
3 BHK734
3 BHK754
2 BHK604
2 BHK574

Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).

02

Builder’s track record

MahaRERA · Promoter registration

Tulsi Developers

PartnershipPromoter type
Nanded, MAHARASHTRABased in
15Projects
12Cities
2017–presentActive
Timelineevery project, start → promised completion
9 SQUARETULSI PATRATulsi DevelopersDWARKESH BUNGLOWSTULSI NANDANSHREE SAI KRUPA APARTMENTTULSI CHAMBERSOPERA HOUSETULSI BUNGLOWSANGATH LIVINGSTULSI VASUNDHARAKRISHNA PALACESANGATH LUXURIATulsi ViharPRAGATI HERITAGE

Tulsi Developers

this project
Residential / Group Housing
Aug 2017registered
Mar 2018target completion
32 flats2,970 sq m
Builder DNAthe whole portfolio, summed
721 homeson the public record across 15 projects
47,292 sq mbuilt-up filed
21,144 sq mland declared
₹33.99 Crdeclared build cost

Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.

Planning authoritiesthis builder's portfolio, by approving body
Ahmedabad Urban Development AuthorityUrban Development Authority2 of 11 projects
Junagadh Municipal CorporationMunicipal / Corporation2 of 11 projects
Rajkot Urban Development AuthorityUrban Development Authority2 of 11 projects
Surat Municipal CorporationMunicipal / Corporation2 of 11 projects
Nashik Municipal CorporationMunicipal Corporation1 of 11 projects
Others1 of 11 projects
Surat Urban Development AuthorityUrban Development Authority1 of 11 projects

Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.

Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.

03

Location

MahaRERA · Registration filing
Village
Nanded Waghala (M Corp.)
Taluka
Nanded
District
Nanded
Pincode
431605
Survey no.
Part of Survey No 40B2 CTS No 10009 and 10010
North boundary
Property of Suresh Dhoot Gundegaonkar and Darak
East boundary
Road and Nandigram Society
South boundary
Property of Ramesh Sarda
West boundary
12 mtr wide road and property of Suresh Dhoot
What’s nearby
SchoolsNo schools within 2km
HealthcareHospital 318m away · 3 clinics within 1km
LifestyleNo parks within 2km · Gym or sports centre 1.5km away · 4 restaurants and cafes within 1km
ShoppingSupermarket 393m away
Getting around
Expressway 788 mPrimary road 458 mRailway line 1.4 kmRailway station 1.7km away (Hazur Sahib Nanded)Bus stop within 1km
Water & environment
Water body 3.1 kmRiver 3.2 km · Asana
distances only — not a flood assessment
Legal & regulatory record
LitigationNone declared to MahaRERA
From MahaRERA's record — the litigation flag is the promoter's declaration; complaints, appeals and non-compliance notices are the authority's own filings. A flagged line is worth checking with the authority; none of it is a verdict on the project.
Complaints register

None on record with MahaRERA against this project.

Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the register — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.

What this record cannot tell you

  • Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
  • Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
  • What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.