Complete project overview
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Units
- 53 units
- Mix
- 42 × LIG Plot No. 1-42 · 11 × EWS Plot No. 43-53
- Carpet area
- 28–56 sq mper-type range, as filed
- Land area
- 6,477 sq m
- Completion deadline extended
- 1 extension on record — latest to 27 Sep 2024declared reason: other than force majeure
Timeline
Find your plot
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-plot listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each size exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RAJ-RERA · Promoter registrationNANAK DEVELOPERS
Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RAJ-RERA · Registration filing- Address
- 3279/731, Barmer Magra, Barmer, Barmer, 344001
- Village
- Barmer Magra
- Taluka
- Barmer
- District
- Barmer
- Pincode
- 344001
₹5.50 Cr declared to build 53 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building planThe promised possession date (27 Sep 2023) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Urban Improvement Trust
A city-level Urban Improvement Trust — Rajasthan's town-development body in cities without a development authority. It has approved 612 RERA projects across 20 districts — about 1 in 4 in Rajasthan.
Volume is context, not a verdict — a busier authority is not a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.
- Construction progress — RAJ-RERA does not publish quarterly progress reports. How far along it actually is cannot be read here.
- Complaints — RAJ-RERA does not publish a complaints register. This read cannot speak to them either way.