TIRUPATI TOWER
Timeline
Filed by floor and type and size, in the batches the builder registered — not a per-flat listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
The only project Horizon has read from this builder so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
₹14.50 Cr declared to build 63 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
In Uttar Pradesh it’s called the circle rate.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Uttar Pradesh's government guidance rates aren't in Horizon's record yet.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
The promised possession date (31 Mar 2018) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Verify it yourself — look up plan 49/12 Group Housing on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the approval.
None on record with UP-RERA against this project.
Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the record — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.
Only what the builder declared, or what UP-RERA records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with UP-RERA, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
33 residential projects still under way within 25 km. Step out ring by ring:
Of the 32 projects the radar draws within 6 km — every kind, every stage — 5 are residential projects still under way. This list keeps only those, and looks further out.
2 projects within 3 km — showing the nearest 2.
BHAVYA GROUP; AJAY KUMAR SONKAR; ASHISH KUMAR SONKAR; GHURE LAL SONKAR; GYAN PRAKASH SONKAR; KUSUM DEVI; SAKAL NARAYAN · Varanasi
SHIVAKASHI HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED; AJAY SINGH; ANIL KUMAR SINGH; DHANAJAY SINGH; DHARMENDRA SINGH; DILIP KUMAR SINGH; GUNJAN SINGH; GYANENDRA PRATAP SINGH; LAKSHMAN SINGH; LALBAHADUR SINGH; LALIT KUMAR SINGH; MUNNA SINGH; NISHA SINGH; RANJEET SINGH; RAVINDRA PRATAP SINGH; SANJAY SINGH; SAVITRI DEVI; SHAILENDRA SINGH; SHIVSHANKAR SINGH; SUJEET SINGH; SUNIL SINGH; SUSHILA SINGH; UDAY PRATAP SINGH; VIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH · Varanasi
Projects within 25 km, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. Distances from the filed coordinates.
What this record cannot tell you