Since the property situated at GH-2,Shiv Vihar Scheme,Village-Mangyawas,Tehsil–Sanganer,Jaipur,on which the promoter is planning to develop &construct the project "Suvaas Utsav",was auctioned in favour of the promoter by JDA & as per Pt 11 of Auction Terms&Conditions of said property(Copy attached under "Project Approval Document" of "Documents Tab"),the promoter is not required to get the maps approved before starting the construction on said property &is required to submit an Affidavit in this regard to the concerned authorities (Copy of Affidavit also attached under "Project Approval Document" of "Documents Tab").The Promoter has complied with the conditions mentioned in the Pt 11 of Auction Terms&Conditions of said property &related documents have been duly uploaded in the RERA Application under the tab "Documents".Also, even though the promoter is not required to get the maps approved as per pt 11 of Auction Terms&Conditions,the promoter has applied for the maps approval,copy of which is also attached under "Project Approval Document" of "Documents Tab".
Further,as per Pt. No. 5 of Circular No. क्रमांक प.18(25) नविवि/सामान्य/2014 dated 27.06.2017 issued by Urban Development & Housing Department(Copy of the same attached under "Project Approval Document" of "Documents Tab")regarding Fire NOC,at the construction stage,instead of submitting Fire NOC,the promoter is only required to submit an Affidavit in this regard(Copy of the same attached under "Project Approval Document" of "Documents Tab"). However, the promoter has applied for Fire NOC, the application of which is also attached under “Documents” tab. With regard to EC, as per notification dated 14.09.2006 & 09.12.2016 respectively issued by Ministry of Environment,Forest &Climate Change,the projects having built up area of less than 20,000 sq. mtrs are not required to obtain EC & since the B.U.A. of our project is less than 20,000 sq. mtrs.,therefore,the requirement for EC is not applicable on said project.
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Expressway 1.9 kmPrimary road 2.3 kmMetro station 2.4km away (Manasarovar)Limited bus connectivity nearby
Water & environment
Water body 3.5 km · Dravyavati River
distances only — not a flood assessment
Price analysisdeclared build cost — not a sale price
₹49.10 Cr declared. What that works out to:
40%of the cost is land
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Location & price analysis — done
04
Government Guidance Rate
Rajasthan IGRS — DLC rates
In Rajasthan it’s called the DLC rate.
₹13,545per sq yd
₹16,200per sq m
Which rate
residential, interior plot
Matched to
The rate published for the village of “MANGYAWAS”.
Highest rate
₹22,776 per sq yd — the top road-facing rate among the 5 residential rates published for this village
By the road it faces
interior plot
₹16,200 / sq m
₹13,545 / sq yd
road-facing
₹22,700 / sq m
₹18,980 / sq yd
41–60 ft road
₹24,970 / sq m
₹20,878 / sq yd
61–99 ft road
₹26,110 / sq m
₹21,831 / sq yd
100 ft+ road
₹27,240 / sq m
₹22,776 / sq yd
The same land, priced by the width of the road it faces — each band the middle of the residential rates published for this village.
What this number is — and isn’t
The minimum value Rajasthan’s registration department will register a sale at. Stamp duty is usually charged on this or the price in the sale deed, whichever is higher.
Not a market price. Sales normally register above it, and how far above varies by place and by project.
Its fit depends on the grain the state publishes at. This one is matched at the level of village, and says so above. How Horizon decides what to show.
Government Guidance Rate — done
05
Planning authority
RAJ-RERA · Approved building plan
Building Permitapproved 25 Sep 2017 · 9 yrs ago
The promised possession date (15 Feb 2020) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
The occupancy certificate — the proof that isn’t here
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Planning authority — done
06
Complaints & litigation
RAJ-RERA · public record
Complaints register
Not published. RAJ-RERA doesn’t publish a complaints register in the record Horizon reads.
So there is nothing to count here — which is not the same as nothing having been filed.
What the builder declared
Declared to RAJ-RERA
Litigation
None declared in this filing
Only what the builder declared, or what RAJ-RERA records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RAJ-RERA, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
Complaints & litigation — done
07
Other projects nearby
The register · within 25 km
421 residential projects still under way within 25 km. Step out ring by ring:
Of the 505 projects the radar draws within 6 km — every kind, every stage — 136 are residential projects still under way. This list keeps only those, and looks further out.