Construction of 843 G+2 Houses
Chief Officer · Krishnarajanagara
VASTAVA GURU PRASANNA
Timeline
Every flat the builder registered. Look yours up and check it is on the record.
Areas are not shown for this project. The sizes filed against these flats are not credible — units recorded as 2 and 3 BHK are filed at sizes no flat is, which usually means square feet were entered in a column the register labels square metres. Publishing those as the registered carpet area would be worse than publishing nothing. The flat numbers and types above are the register’s.
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
₹5.76 Cr declared. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
In Karnataka it’s called the guidance value.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Karnataka's guidance-value gazettes are in Horizon's record, but this project's address doesn't name a place any of its sub-registrar's tables print.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
The promised possession date (3 Aug 2023) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Has approved 429 RERA projects — about 1 in 20 in Karnataka.
a plotted-layout market — 14% apartments · 86% plotted layouts. Apartments like yours are the smaller share here — this body mostly approves plotted layouts.
More layout-heavy than Karnataka overall — 86% plots here vs 38% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
None on record with RERA Karnataka against this project.
Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the record — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.
Only what the builder declared, or what RERA Karnataka records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RERA Karnataka, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
35 residential projects still under way within 25 km. Step out ring by ring:
Of the 123 projects the radar draws within 6 km — every kind, every stage — 22 are residential projects still under way. This list keeps only those, and looks further out.
2 projects within 1 km — showing the nearest 2.
Chief Officer · Krishnarajanagara
M MAHESH SHENOY · MYSORE
Projects within 25 km, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. Distances from the filed coordinates.
What this record cannot tell you