HORIZONMarkets
01

Complete project overview

RERA Karnataka · Registration filing
Status
Completed
Towers
1
Land area
3,176 sq m
FAR sanctioned
5143
Covered area
1,285 sq m
Open area
1,891 sq m
Garage area
880 sq m

Timeline

Project startedFeb 2016
RERA registeredOct 2017
Proposed completionDec 2017
TodayJul 2026
02

Builder’s track record

RERA Karnataka · Promoter registration

Vijaya Enterprises

Bengaluru UrbanBased in
3Projects
1City
2017–2024Active
Timelineevery project, start → promised completion
Builder DNAthe whole portfolio, summed
21 homeson the public record across 3 projects
3,153 sq mbuilt-up filed
18,616 sq mland declared
₹115.48 Crdeclared build cost

Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.

Planning authoritiesthis builder's portfolio, by approving body
BBMP - Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara PalikeMunicipal / Corporation2 of 3 projects
BMRDA - Bangalore Metropolitan Region Development AuthorityUrban Development Authoritythis project1 of 3 projects

Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.

Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.

03

Location & price analysis

RERA Karnataka · Registration filing
Taluk
Bengaluru South
District
Bengaluru Urban
Pincode
560004
Address
1643, Sy. No. 151/1, off. Kanakapura Road, Kaggalipura Village, Uttarahalli Hobli
What’s nearby
SchoolsNo schools within 2km
HealthcareHospital 1.8km away
LifestyleNo parks within 2km · 4 restaurants and cafes within 1km
ShoppingNo supermarket within 2km
Getting around
Expressway 646 m · Kanakapura RoadNo metro or railway within 5kmBus stop within 1km
Water & environment
Water body 832 m
distances only — not a flood assessment
Price analysisdeclared build cost — not a sale price

₹16.00 Cr declared. What that works out to:

25%of the cost is land

This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.

04

Planning authority

RERA Karnataka · Approved building plan

BMRDA - Bangalore Metropolitan Region Development Authority

Urban Development Authority
Building Permit

The promised possession date (30 Dec 2017) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.

The occupancy certificate — the proof that isn’t here

A sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.

The approving body, at scale

BMRDA

Urban Development Authority · Bangalore Metropolitan Region Development Authority

Has approved 550 RERA projectsabout 1 in 16 in Karnataka.

a mixed market46% apartments · 54% plotted layouts.

Builders
441
On record
16,246 flats · 16,792 plots
Reach
14 taluks
Since
2017

More layout-heavy than Karnataka overall — 54% plots here vs 38% statewide.

Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.

Complaints register

None on record with RERA Karnataka against this project.

Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the register — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.

What this record cannot tell you

  • Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
  • Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
  • What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.