HOSURKAR'S TULSI VRINDAVAN LAYOUT
MANOHAR LAXMANRAO HOSURKAR
Lotus RVP City
Timeline
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
₹5.70 Cr declared. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
In Karnataka it’s called the guidance value.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Karnataka's guidance-value gazettes are in Horizon's record, but this project's address doesn't name a place any of its sub-registrar's tables print.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
The promised possession date (31 Dec 2020) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Has approved 116 RERA projects — 1.3% of Karnataka.
an apartments market — 82% apartments · 18% plotted layouts. Layouts like yours are the smaller share here — this body mostly approves apartments.
More apartment-heavy than Karnataka overall — 82% apartments here vs 62% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
1 complaint · 1 disposed · 0 open
A disposed complaint may have been resolved for or against the builder, and only disputes escalated to RERA Karnataka appear here at all.
| Number | Date | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190211/0002094 | Lotus RVP City Project is not developed and no refund provided | 11 Feb 2019 | Disposed — adjudicating officer |
Only what the builder declared, or what RERA Karnataka records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RERA Karnataka, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
16 plotted projects still under way within Belagavi. Step out ring by ring:
Of the 96 projects the radar draws within 6 km — every kind, every stage — none is a plotted project still under way. This list keeps only those, and looks further out.
2 projects within 25 km — showing the nearest 2.
MANOHAR LAXMANRAO HOSURKAR
GIRDHARILAL BHAGIRATH TAPADIA
Projects within Belagavi, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. This project’s coordinate is approximate, so distances are rough.
What this record cannot tell you