HOSURKAR'S TULSI VRINDAVAN LAYOUT
MANOHAR LAXMANRAO HOSURKAR · Belagavi
PATIL DEVELOPMENT GROUP
Timeline
Every plot the builder registered. Look yours up and check it is on the record.
Areas are not shown for this project. The sizes filed against these plots are not credible — units recorded as 2 and 3 BHK are filed at sizes no plot is, which usually means square feet were entered in a column the register labels square metres. Publishing those as the registered carpet area would be worse than publishing nothing. The plot numbers and types above are the register’s.
The only project Horizon has read from this builder so far. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
₹15.18 Cr declared to build 70 plots. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
In Karnataka it’s called the guidance value.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Karnataka's guidance-value gazettes are in Horizon's record, but this project's address doesn't name a place any of its sub-registrar's tables print.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
The promised possession date (31 Mar 2023) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Verify it yourself — look up plan NO.BUDA/YOJANA/PLAN/CR-06/2020-21/54 on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the approval.
Has approved 116 RERA projects — 1.3% of Karnataka.
an apartments market — 82% apartments · 18% plotted layouts. Layouts like yours are the smaller share here — this body mostly approves apartments.
More apartment-heavy than Karnataka overall — 82% apartments here vs 62% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
None on record with RERA Karnataka against this project.
Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the record — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.
The builder's own declaration at registration — not a court's or RERA Karnataka's finding. A flagged line is worth checking with RERA Karnataka.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RERA Karnataka, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
16 plotted projects still under way within Belagavi. Step out ring by ring:
Of the 118 projects the radar draws within 6 km — every kind, every stage — none is a plotted project still under way. This list keeps only those, and looks further out.
2 projects within 25 km — showing the nearest 2.
MANOHAR LAXMANRAO HOSURKAR · Belagavi
GIRDHARILAL BHAGIRATH TAPADIA · Belagavi
Projects within Belagavi, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. Distances from the filed coordinates.
What this record cannot tell you