Complete project overview
RERA Karnataka · Registration filing- Status
- New Project Launch
- Units
- 200 units
- Unit mix
- 44 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 4 · 44 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 2 · 22 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 6 · 13 × 1BHK - Type 1 · 12 × 1BHK - Type 2 · 11 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 11 · 11 × 1BHK - Type 4 · 11 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 9 · 11 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 8 · 8 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 1 · 8 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 3 · 2 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 10 · 1 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 7 · 1 × 1BHK - Type 3 · 1 × STUDIO UNIT - Type 5
- Towers
- 1
- Floors
- 12
- Land area
- 5,158 sq m
- Built-up area
- 11,382 sq m
- FAR sanctioned
- 2.222
- Covered area
- 882 sq m
- Open area
- 4,276 sq m
- Land parcels
- 1 survey no
Timeline
4% overall, as filed
Find your flat
Filed by type and size, in the batches the promoter registered — not a per-flat listing. Look yours up.
Shown in sq m. The filing records square metres; the sq-ft view is a straight conversion. The declared inventory as registered — how many of each type exist, not how many are still unsold (this state's filing carries no booking count).
Builder’s track record
RERA Karnataka · Promoter registrationSattva Resi Private Limited
Build cost is what the promoter declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Counts are how many of this builder’s projects on Horizon’s record were approved by each body — a footprint, not a ranking of the authorities.
Every project Horizon has read from this promoter, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
Location & price analysis
RERA Karnataka · Registration filing- Taluk
- Devanahalli
- District
- Bengaluru Rural
- Pincode
- 562110
- Address
- Khatha No: 150300200400121896, Survey No.159 (P), situated at Kannamangala Village , Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District , Devanahalli , Bengaluru Rural, Karnataka - 562110
- North boundary
- Property bearing Survey Nos.166 & 160
- East boundary
- Property bearing Survey No.73 (P)
- South boundary
- Road and property bearing Survey No.117
- West boundary
- Road formed in Survey No.159 and portion of Survey No.117
₹61.91 Cr declared to build 200 flats. What that works out to:
This is what the promoter filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
Planning authority
RERA Karnataka · Approved building planA sanctioned plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the sanctioned plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Verify it yourself — look up plan 2182 on the approving authority’s portal to confirm the sanction.
BIAPPA
Urban Development Authority · Bangalore Airport Area Planning AuthorityHas approved 328 RERA projects — 3.8% of Karnataka.
a plotted-layout market — 30% apartments · 70% plotted layouts. Apartments like yours are the smaller share here — this body mostly approves plotted layouts.
- Builders
- 236
- On record
- 20,448 flats · 19,692 plots
- Reach
- 8 taluks
- Since
- 2017
More layout-heavy than Karnataka overall — 70% plots here vs 38% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
None on record with RERA Karnataka against this project.
Only disputes escalated to the authority appear on the register — a private disagreement never filed here would not. A count from the public record, not a verdict.
What this record cannot tell you
- Build quality — no filing records how well it was actually built.
- Private disputes — only complaints escalated to the authority appear here.
- What it will be worth — the record is the past; it does not price the future.