GOLDEN PEARL PHASE - 2
Global Developers · Anekal
ARYAN GOLDEN ARENA
Timeline
Every flat the builder registered. Look yours up and check it is on the record.
Areas are not shown for this project. The sizes filed against these flats are not credible — units recorded as 2 and 3 BHK are filed at sizes no flat is, which usually means square feet were entered in a column the register labels square metres. Publishing those as the registered carpet area would be worse than publishing nothing. The flat numbers and types above are the register’s.
Build cost is what the builder declared it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration. It gives a sense of how big a builder this is — not a price you pay, not build quality, and not whether they finish on time.
Every project Horizon has read from this builder, oldest first on the timeline. Dates are the project’s start (where filed) and target-completion dates on the RERA filing; delivery isn’t reported here.
₹8.61 Cr declared. What that works out to:
This is what the builder filed it costs to build — land plus construction, at registration — not a sale price. The gap to an asking price is their margin, taxes and anything the filing doesn’t carry.
In Karnataka it’s called the guidance value.
No government guidance rate is shown for this project.
Karnataka's guidance-value gazettes are in Horizon's record, but this project's address doesn't name a place any of its sub-registrar's tables print.
That is a statement about what Horizon can place — not a sign that no rate exists, and not a signal about the project.
The promised possession date (31 Mar 2021) has passed. This record can’t confirm whether the project was completed — that sign-off is the occupancy certificate, below.
An approved plan is the government’s approval to build. It is not proof the project was built to that plan. That sign-off is the Occupancy Certificate (OC) — issued by the planning authority, the same body that approved the plan, not by RERA— and it isn’t in this record. Ask the builder for it, or check with the authority. Without an OC, banks may decline home loans, and any deviation from the approved plan carries penalty or demolition risk.
Has approved 550 RERA projects — about 1 in 16 in Karnataka.
a mixed market — 46% apartments · 54% plotted layouts.
More layout-heavy than Karnataka overall — 54% plots here vs 38% statewide.
Volume and mix are context, not a verdict — a busier body isn’t a safer project. And this counts RERA-registered projects on Horizon’s record, not all construction.
15 complaints · of the 14 listed below, 10 disposed and 4 open
A disposed complaint may have been resolved for or against the builder, and only disputes escalated to RERA Karnataka appear here at all.
14 of the 15 could be matched to this project on the register by name; the rest can't be told apart from same-named projects.
| Number | Date | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00489/2025 | ix. It is submitted that the 27 months from 07.09.2017 expired in and around December 2019. However, till date the Respondents have not been able to complete the constructions and hand over the Schedu | 15 Mar 2025 | Posted for orders — full bench of the authorityopen |
| 00068/2025 | Not Deliverd the flat on the time and work still not started therefore return of money with interest and expenses | 7 Jan 2025 | Posted for orders — full bench of the authorityopen |
| 01242/2024 | Application by the allottees to take over of the project | 25 Nov 2024 | Disposed — full bench of the authority |
| 00907/2024 | Compalaint u/s 31 of RERA act | 18 Sep 2024 | Posted for orders — full bench of the authorityopen |
| 01250/2023 | Project Not completed till the time | 17 Aug 2023 | Disposed — authority bench 5 |
| Number | Date | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00130/2023 | Complaint under Section 31 of RERA alongwith supporting affidavit. | 31 Jan 2023 | Disposed — authority bench 5 |
| CMP/220408/0009327 | Refund of the booking along with Interest paid | 8 Apr 2022 | Disposed — authority bench 6 |
| CMP/210914/0008332 | Refund of Amount - Aryan Hometec | 14 Sep 2021 | Disposed — authority bench 6 |
| CMP/200823/0006403 | Refund of booking amount and loan amount processed till date | 23 Aug 2020 | Disposed — full bench of the authority |
| CMP/200730/0006271 | Refund with Bank interest | 30 Jul 2020 | Disposed — authority bench 5 |
| CMP/200229/0005595 | Cancelation of unit [no.] and refund of entire payment made. | 29 Feb 2020 | Disposed — adjudicating officer |
| CMP/200122/0005272 | Golden Aryan Arena- Pre EMI , cancellation of unit at Golden Arena & reimbursement of paid amount | 22 Jan 2020 | Posted for orders — full bench of the authorityopen |
| CMP/200102/0005118 | Builder not paying Pre EMIs payment by the builder till possession as commited. | 2 Jan 2020 | Disposed — authority bench 6 |
| CMP/191219/0005021 | Cancellation of Unit [no.] and Refund of Payments made | 19 Dec 2019 | Disposed — adjudicating officer |
Only what the builder declared, or what RERA Karnataka records itself, can appear here — a case filed elsewhere and never declared would not.
Not a verdict. A complaint can be dismissed and a case can be won; an order can be appealed.
Not a clean bill. An empty record means nothing was filed with RERA Karnataka, or that this register doesn’t publish it — never that nothing happened.
577 residential projects still under way within 25 km. Step out ring by ring:
Of the 118 projects the radar draws within 6 km — every kind, every stage — 37 are residential projects still under way. This list keeps only those, and looks further out.
1 project within 1 km — showing the nearest 1.
Global Developers · Anekal
Projects within 25 km, nearest first — closed ones excluded, nothing ranked. Distances from the filed coordinates.
What this record cannot tell you